The Quality of Scientific Research in the Field of Business Administration and its Impact on Achieving Administrative Development of Human Resources in Originations: A Theoretical and Applied Study
Article Sidebar
- Administrative Scientific Research, Quality of Administrative Research, Administrative Development of Human Resources
Abstract
The study aimed know the Impact of quality of administrative scientific research on achieving administrative development of human resources, the descriptive analytical approach was used to complete the study, A questionnaire was used to collect data, A stratified random sample used to determine the sample items which amounted to 300 items, it was distribute electronically, the response rate, the statistical analysis was carried out using statically Methods appropriate to the Nature, objectives and data of the study.The results showed that there is a statistically significant positive correlation and impact between the criteria of scientific research quality (Credibility, reliability, Verifiability, reflectivity, Transferability) and the administrative development of human resources in its various dimensions, finally, the study presented a set of recommendations and future research proposals.
Full text article
References
Abd al-Hamid, F., al-Mikhlafi, H., & Mahmoud, M. (2021). Improving the quality of scientific research in social sciences and humanities. Jazan University, Research Efficiency Enhancement Project.
Abd al-Rahim, N. M. L. (2021). Contributions of scientific research in social work fields to achieving Egypt's sustainable development strategy 2030. Journal of the Future of Social Sciences, 7(4), 39–69.
Abd al-Salam, A. (2016). Research quality in Egyptian universities: Indicators and supporting systems. Future of Arab Education Journal, 23(102).
Abu Taqia, G. (2022). Approved standards for scientific research quality in Syria: A case study of the Higher Commission for Scientific Research [Master’s thesis in Business Administration]. Higher Institute of Business Administration, Syria.
Ahmed, B. I. (2020). Scientific research quality: Standards, requirements, obstacles, and developmental procedures from researchers' perspective: A qualitative study using grounded theory. Educational Journal, Faculty of Education in Sohag, Sohag University, 69(69), 1–27.
Ahmed, H. A. R. (2018). The impact of human capital development on administrative development: Applied to Shaqra University [Master’s thesis]. Shaqra University.
Al-Abid, S. I. (2024). Scientific research: Research visions and debates. Takween Center for Studies and Research.
Al-Atwi, I., & Al-Hamoud, A. (2021). Systematic review of scientific research. Abdullah Al-Muqhem for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Amri, M. A. (2020). The role of business intelligence in administrative development. King Abdulaziz University.
Al-Hazli, H. M., & Al-Otaibi, F. M. (2021). The brief in writing a research plan. Jarri Bookshop.
Al-Nashmi, N. A. (2018). Human resource development: Change strategy and international experiences. Jarri Bookshop.
Al-Niadi, M. A. (2023). The role of administrative development in improving job performance of employees [Master’s thesis, Abu Dhabi University].
Al-Qahtani, A. S. M. (2019). Measuring the availability level of scientific research quality indicators at King Khalid University and mechanisms for improvement. Arab Journal for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 12(42), 31–56.
Al-Rashid, A. S. (2023). Writing scientific research: Principles, theories, and experiences. Afaq al-Ma'rifa.
Al-Sawi, Y. M. M. (2017). Total quality requirements for scientific research from the perspective of academic evaluation for Saudi universities within Vision 2030 [Symposium paper]. Symposium on Evaluation in University Education: Foundations and Aspirations, Faculty of Education, Jouf University.
Al-Tai, M. (2021). Towards an effective strategy to ensure quality in scientific research in the Arab world. Arab Journal for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 5(10), 131.
Al-Zuhairi, T. N. (2018). Indicators for measuring the quality of scientific productivity for scientists and researchers: An evaluative study. Iraqi Journal for Information Technology, 8(3), 72–85.
Faraj, S. I. H. (2019). Job rotation and its relationship to administrative development among public school female leaders in Taif. Taif.
Habbaneh, S. F. A. (2022). Administrative development. Dar Al-Ibtikar for Publishing and Distribution.
Mahmoud, H. M. H. (2022). A proposed vision for developing obstacles to scientific research in the Arab world. Arab Journal of Measurement and Evaluation, (5), 207–224.
Mansouri, K. (2017). Controls and criteria for refereeing university research and theses. Journal of Banking Financial Economics and Business Administration, (3), 40–41.
Mousa, T. M. H. (2023). The role of scientific research in sustainable development from the perspective of researchers in scientific and research centers in Sana'a. Sana'a University Journal of Humanities, 6(2), 384–416.
Raheel, M. F., & Al-Sheikhi, B. S. (2017). Scientific research between quality and excellence: Concepts and premises. Sada al-Ma'rifa Journal, (7), 56–79.
Rashid, B. R. (2023). Contributions of current scientific research in the communicative environment. Al-Hikma Journal for Scientific and Communication Studies, 11(2), 82–98.
Shaaban, A. I. (2017). The effectiveness of human resource management training for administrative leaders and its relationship to administrative development in Northern Jordan universities [Doctoral dissertation].
Yassin, G. (2019). Scientific research techniques. Jarri Bookshop.
Ali, A. M. & Yusof, H. (2011). Quality in qualitative studies: The case of validity, reliability and generalizability”. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 5 (1-2): 25-64.Banshal, S.; Singh, V.; Basu, A. & Muhuri. P. (2017). Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology, Current Science, Vol. 112, No. 5, 10 Marc, pp. 923-932.Boaz, A. & Ashby, D. (2023). Fit for purpose? Assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice.Crotty, M. (2015). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage Publications.Frambach, J. M.; van der Vleuten, C. P. & Durning, S. J. (2013). AM last page: Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research, Academic Medicine, 88 (4): 552.Gersten, R.; Baker, S. & Lloyd, J. W. (2016). Designing high quality research in special education: Group experimental design. The Journal of Special Education, 33 (2), 1-21.Gersten, R.; Baker, S. & Lloyd, J. W. (2022). Designing high quality research in special education: Group experimental design. The Journal of Special Education, 33 (2), 1-21.Hammarberg, K.; Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them, Human Reproduction, 31 (3): 498-501.Hasan, N. (2015). Mukhtiar, research output of Indian institutes of technology (IITs): A scient metric study qualitative and quantitative methods in libraries (QQML), 4, 293-305.Ritchie, J.; Lewis, J.; Nicholls, C. M. & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 The Arab Journal of Administration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.